首页> 外文OA文献 >Extent of Integration of Priority Interventions into General Health Systems: A Case Study of Neglected Tropical Diseases Programme in the Western Region of Ghana
【2h】

Extent of Integration of Priority Interventions into General Health Systems: A Case Study of Neglected Tropical Diseases Programme in the Western Region of Ghana

机译:将优先干预纳入一般卫生系统的程度:以加纳西部地区被忽视的热带病计划为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background\udThe global health system has a large arsenal of interventions, medical products and technologies to address current global health challenges. However, identifying the most effective and efficient strategies to deliver these resources to where they are most needed has been a challenge. Targeted and integrated interventions have been the main delivery strategies. However, the health system discourse increasingly favours integrated strategies in the context of functionally merging targeted interventions with multifunctional health care delivery systems with a focus on strengthening country health systems to deliver needed interventions. Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD) have been identified to promote and perpetuate poverty hence there has been global effort to combat these diseases. The Neglected Tropical Diseases Programme (NTDP) in Ghana has a national programme team and office, however, it depends on the multifunctional health delivery system at the regional and district level to implement interventions. The NTDP seeks further health system integration to accelerate achievement of coverage targets. The study estimated the extent of integration of the NTDP at the national, regional and district levels to provide evidence to guide further integration.\ud\udMethodology/Principal Findings\udThe research design was a descriptive case study that interviewed key persons involved in the programme at the three levels of the health system as well as extensive document review. Integration was assessed on two planes—across health system functions–stewardship and governance, financing, planning, service delivery, monitoring and evaluation and demand generation; and across three administrative levels of the health system–national, regional and district. A composite measure of integration designated Cumulative Integration Index (CII) with a range of 0.00–1.00 was used to estimate extent of integration at the three levels of the health system. Service delivery was most integrated while financing and planning were least integrated. Extent of integration was partial at all levels of the health system with a CII of 0.48–0.68; however it was higher at the district compared to the national and regional levels.\ud\udConclusions/Significance\udTo ensure further integration of the NTDP, planning and finance management activities must be decentralized to involve regional and district levels of the health system. The study provides an empirical measure of extent of integration and indicators to guide further integration.\ud\udAuthor Summary\udTwo main strategies have been used to address diseases that affects large sections of populations. One strategy called targeted or vertical programme sets up separate system from the general health system with its own human resources, management, implementation, data reporting and evaluation systems. Integrated (also called horizontal) strategy on the other hand uses existing health system structures to implement activities to control target health problems. Integrated strategy is preferred because it strengthens country health systems. The Neglected Tropical Diseases Programme (NTDP) in Ghana has a dedicated management structure at the national level but uses general health system structures at the regional and district levels to implement activities. This study assessed the extent of integration of the NTDP into the health system at the national, regional and district levels. It was found that the NTDP activities were better integrated at the district compared to the regional and national levels of the health system. Furthermore, it also found that service delivery activities were most integrated while financing and planning activities were least integrated at all levels of the health system. These findings provide points to guide efforts to make the NTDP more integrated and can be applied to other health programmes.
机译:背景\ ud全球卫生系统拥有大量的干预措施,医疗产品和技术,可以应对当前的全球卫生挑战。但是,确定最有效的策略将这些资源交付到最需要的地方一直是一个挑战。有针对性的综合干预措施已成为主要的交付策略。但是,在将目标干预措施与多功能卫生保健提供系统进行功能性合并的背景下,卫生系统的论述越来越倾向于综合战略,重点是加强国家卫生系统以提供所需的干预措施。人们已经确定了被忽视的热带病(NTD)可以促进和使贫困持久化,因此,全球正在努力与这些疾病作斗争。加纳的“被忽视的热带病计划”(NTDP)拥有一个国家计划团队和办公室,但是,它需要依靠地区和地区级的多功能医疗体系来实施干预措施。 NTDP寻求进一步整合卫生系统,以加快实现覆盖目标。该研究估计了NTDP在国家,地区和地区各级的整合程度,以提供指导进一步整合的证据。\ ud \ ud方法论/主要发现\ ud研究设计是一个描述性案例研究,采访了参与该计划的关键人物在卫生系统的三个层次上以及广泛的文件审查中。在卫生系统职能的两个层面上对整合进行了评估:管理和治理,筹资,计划,服务提供,监测和评估以及需求的产生;以及卫生系统的三个行政级别(国家,地区和地区)。整合的综合衡量指标为累积整合指数(CII),范围在0.00-1.00之间,用于估计卫生系统三个级别的整合程度。服务交付的集成度最高,而融资和计划的集成度最低。一体化程度在卫生系统的各个层次上都是局部的,CII为0.48–0.68。 \ ud \ ud结论/重要性\ ud为了确保NTDP的进一步整合,必须分散计划和财务管理活动,以使卫生系统的区域和地区级参与其中。该研究提供了整合程度和指标的经验度量,以指导进一步整合。\ ud \ ud作者摘要\ ud已使用两种主要策略来解决影响大部分人口的疾病。一种称为目标计划或纵向计划的策略通过其自身的人力资源,管理,实施,数据报告和评估系统来建立与普通卫生系统不同的系统。另一方面,综合(也称为横向)策略使用现有的卫生系统结构来实施控制目标健康问题的活动。首选综合战略,因为它可以加强国家卫生系统。加纳的被忽视的热带病计划(NTDP)在国家一级具有专门的管理架构,但在区域和地区一级使用一般卫生系统架构来实施活动。这项研究评估了在国家,地区和地区各级将NTDP纳入卫生系统的程度。发现与卫生系统的区域和国家层面相比,NTDP活动在该地区得到了更好的整合。此外,它还发现,在卫生系统的各个层面,服务提供活动的整合程度最高,而筹资和计划活动的整合程度最低。这些发现提供了指导点,以指导努力使NTDP更加一体化,并可以应用于其他卫生计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号